If someone wanted to harm Putin, they would organize a terrorist attack in Russia before the elections or on the day of Putin’s re-election, but there is no point in doing this after this event, said Garry Kasparov. Since we are talking about the fact that the tragedy happened after 17 March and as a result, with its help, the head of the Kremlin was legitimized, it becomes obvious who is behind the terrorist attack. Garry Kasparov’s interview can be viewed on the YouTube channel. “This is not just a war with Ukraine, but a war with the entire civilized world, and accordingly, the war requires some new cardinal decisions. When we begin to put all this together, it is logical to assume that the same people who 25 years ago came to power on the wave of terrorist attacks today may well think: why not (for 25 years, they did what they wanted, so let us do this),” the Russian oppositionist voiced his version of events in Crocus City.
Garry Kasparov also explained who actually benefited from organizing the terrorist attack: “Another fact speaks in favour of this version: if it were only ISIS, but we understand that Islamic groups were “bred in test tubes” by the KGB, so from the fact that it was “ISIS” does not mean that there were no special services behind it, which could well have used them for their own purposes. If the goal was to inflict damage on Putin, then this terrorist attack should have been carried out before 17 March but it is carried out after when Putin is no longer in danger.” “I believe that the first thing we need to consider is the possibility that either Putin himself, or his entourage, or some combination of these factors prepared this terrorist attack as a way to mobilize Russian public opinion. There is another important point here. Look at the first result of the terrorist attack. It is external, and many people miss this: a quasi-legitimization of the terrorist illegal regime has occurred,” the famous chess player emphasized.
Диалог
